Every megatall project reaches the same argument sooner or later: how much diversity do we take on the chilled water? One side wants a single percentage for the tower, another wants one per use, and the pump, heat-exchanger and chiller schedules quietly end up on different bases. The argument never closes because it is about the wrong thing. Diversity is not a number you choose once; it is a result that changes at every level of the system. We built an hour-by-hour model of a mixed-use Gulf tower (offices, hotel, residences, retail, a ballroom and an observation deck) to show where it really comes from. The plant needs 0.86 of the sum of terminal peaks. Almost all of that saving sits inside each floor and inside each use, and a blanket 0.70 would leave the plant 18 % short on the design day.

1 · Two words for one idea, and two ideas under one word

Half of the disputes about diversity are about vocabulary. Electrical engineering, where the terms come from, defines the diversity factor as the sum of the individual maximum demands divided by the maximum demand of the group, a number of one or more [1]. HVAC engineers usually mean its reciprocal, the coincidence or simultaneity factor, a number of one or less:

\[ DF = \frac{\sum_i \hat{q}_i}{\max_t \sum_i q_i(t)} \;\ge 1, \qquad CF = \frac{1}{DF} = \frac{\max_t \sum_i q_i(t)}{\sum_i \hat{q}_i} \;\le 1 \]

where \(q_i(t)\) is the load of zone \(i\) at hour \(t\) and \(\hat{q}_i\) is that zone's own peak. "Take 80 % diversity" can mean a factor of 0.80 or of 1.25, so a design basis that does not say which is not a design basis. This article quotes the coincidence factor throughout and calls it that.

The second problem is that two physically different effects hide under the one word:

Weather-driven loads, meaning solar gain, conduction, infiltration and outdoor air at its design rate, have no usage diversity. The sun reaches every floor of the west façade at the same moment, whether the rooms behind it are let or not.

2 · The tower we modelled

Corrected 24 September 2026The first version of the model counted the corners of each floor twice when it split the floor into perimeter zones. The plant block is unchanged at 21,043 kW. The connected load is now 24,538 kW instead of 24,346 kW, the tower coincidence 0.858 instead of 0.864, and a blanket 0.70 is 18 % short instead of 19 %. The tables, charts and text below use the corrected figures.

The example is a mixed-use megatall on the Gulf coast. It has a retail podium, a ballroom and dining level, forty office floors, thirty hotel floors, fifty residential floors and an observation deck, with 243,500 m² of conditioned floor. Every floor is split into four perimeter zones and a core. For each zone the model builds a 24-hour design-day load from four sources:

The coastal design day peaks at 42 °C with a humidity ratio of 20.5 g/kg, which keeps the outdoor enthalpy above 85 kJ/kg all night. A second, inland climate (45.5 °C, 8 g/kg) is included for comparison. The design-day inputs are illustrative; a project must use its own ASHRAE climatic design data [4].

The example programme. Unit counts set the statistical usage diversity; the mean usage and its spread are stated assumptions a project should replace with its own.
UseFloorsArea (m²)Load peaks aroundIndependent unitsMean usage at peak
Retail podium428,00018:00–19:00 (evening crowds)1600.90
Ballroom, meeting and dining26,000Lunch and dinner events1 (an event)1.00
Offices4088,00014:00–15:00160 tenancies0.85
Hotel guest rooms3048,00016:00–17:00 on the chilled water900 rooms0.85
Residences5070,00016:00–17:00 on the chilled water400 apartments0.75
Observation deck and entertainment23,50016:00–20:00 (sunset visitors)1 (a crowd)1.00
Process (IT, telecom, lift and electrical rooms)––Constant–1.00

Note the hotel rooms and the residences. Their occupants are home in the evening, yet their chilled-water peak falls at 16:00–17:00. On a Gulf façade the sun on the west glass and the round-the-clock outdoor air outweigh the evening rise in people and cooking. This is the first thing a schedule-only argument gets wrong.

3 · Interactive: the tower, hour by hour

Tower chilled-water load on the design day, stacked by use
Each band is one use with all its floors: envelope + usage-diversified internal gains + ventilation. The upper dashed line is the connected load (every terminal and ventilation unit at its own peak). The lower dashed line is the sum of each use's own peak. The marker is the tower block, the load the plant actually meets.
Humid coastal air keeps the ventilation load high all night; dry inland air does not.
Average share of full internal gain across the apartments at their peak hour. Vacant or seasonal units pull it down.
Design occupancy of the guest rooms.
Average share of full occupancy and equipment across the tenancies.
z in the usage allowance: 0 takes the mean, 1.65 covers 95 % of days, 2.33 covers 99 %.
Connected
24,538 kW
Tower block
21,043 kW
Block hour
14–15 h
Coincidence
0.86
Night minimum
0.37 of peak

At the defaults the coastal tower peaks at 14:00–15:00 with 21,043 kW, against a connected load of 24,538 kW: a coincidence factor of 0.86, or 86 W/m² against 101 (41 m² per ton of refrigeration). Drop the residential usage to 0.40, an extreme that treats most apartments as empty, and the block falls only from 21,043 to 20,834 kW, 1 %, because the residences' envelope and outdoor air do not care whether anyone is home. The night minimum of 0.37 of the peak is the turndown the plant must handle in summer, before winter lowers it further.

4 · Where the diversity actually comes from

Follow the load up the system, from the terminals to the plant, and record the coincident peak at each level. Each row below is what equipment at that level has to be sized for, and each is smaller than the one above it:

Coastal climate, default assumptions. Coincidence is relative to the connected load in the first row.
LevelLoad (kW)CoincidenceWhat is sized on it
Every terminal and ventilation unit at its own peak (connected)24,5381.000Fan-coil units, VAV boxes, chilled beams, fresh-air units, their control valves and branch pipes
Sum of floor blocks22,6920.925Floor AHU coils, floor branch mains
Sum of use blocks22,0600.899Risers serving one use
Sum of hydraulic-zone blocks21,4460.874Zone pumps; heat exchangers (see section 9 for the cascade)
Tower block21,0430.858Chillers, primary pumps, heat rejection, district-cooling contract

The largest single step, 7.5 %, comes inside one floor, mostly because its four façades peak at different hours; the rest is the small statistical allowance for the units on one floor. Look at one office floor:

One office floor (2,200 m²), coastal design day. Every terminal is sized at its own peak, with no factor.
ZoneArea (m²)Own peak (kW)W/m²Peak hour
North perimeter19123.012015:00–16:00
East perimeter19132.817209:00–10:00
South perimeter19122.711913:00–14:00
West perimeter19134.618116:00–17:00
Core1,43751.736Flat from 09:00
Floor ventilation–68.7–13:00–14:00
Sum of peaks / floor block2,200233.5 / 219.4–Block at 14:00–15:00

The east fan coils must deliver their 172 W/m² at nine in the morning and the west ones their 181 at four in the afternoon. A single "diversity" applied to the terminals would short one of them. The floor as a whole, however, never needs more than 219.4 kW. That 0.94 is the orientation diversity, and it is free.

The next step, from floors to uses, is the statistical one: 160 office tenancies do not all run at full density on the same afternoon, and 400 apartments do not all cook at once. The steps after that, between uses and between hydraulic zones, are small: 2.5 % and 1.6 % of the connected load. That is the finding that surprises people. In a hot climate, mixing uses buys little chilled-water diversity, because the loads that dominate (sun on glass, outdoor air, infiltration) peak together across every use within the same afternoon hours.

Why not 0.55?A figure of 0.5–0.6 for a mixed-use tower is often quoted, and an earlier version of our own cooling-load article used it, in a simple model where the coincidence approaches an asymptote as the number of independently-peaking zones grows. That shape is right for the usage-driven share of the load and wrong for the weather-driven share, which does not become independent however many floors you add. In this tower the weather-driven share is large, so the tower lands at 0.86, not 0.6. In a cooler climate, or in a building where people and equipment dominate, the true figure moves down, but it has to be shown by calculation, not assumed. The cooling-load article has since been corrected to use this split.

5 · Interactive: diversity, level by level

How the coincident load falls as the system aggregates
"Levels" shows the load at each level of the hierarchy as a share of the connected load. "Uses" compares, for each use, its connected load, its own block (all its floors at its own peak hour) and what it contributes at the tower's peak hour. The last of these is the only honest meaning of a per-use factor. Default usage assumptions.
The same tower in two climates.
Switch between the aggregation cascade and the per-use contributions.
Within the floor
−7.5 %
Within each use
−2.6 %
Between uses and zones
−4.1 %
Tower coincidence
0.858

The first three readouts are percentage points of the connected load removed at each stage, so they add up to one minus the tower coincidence. Inland the tower coincidence drops to 0.837. Dry air shrinks the outdoor-air load, which peaks in the same hour on every floor, from about 36 % of the peak to 20 %, so more of the peak is sun on glass, which moves round the façades, and people, who diversify. The ranking holds: most of the saving is inside floors and inside uses. In the "Uses" view the retail podium contributes only 0.74 of its connected load at the tower's peak, because the crowds arrive after 18:00. The ballroom contributes all of its load, because a full event at the design hour is exactly what it is designed for.

6 · One percentage for the tower, or one per use?

Neither, as an input. Both are legitimate as a check, once the block calculation exists.

A single percentage for the tower is a result: here it is 0.858, and it applies to one thing only, the plant, against the connected load. Applying it anywhere else is an error. On the terminals it undersizes every fan coil by 14 %. On a heat exchanger it assumes diversity between zones that, in this tower, do not have any (section 9).

Per-use percentages are also results, and they depend on the whole mix, not just on the use:

Coastal climate, default assumptions. "At tower peak" is each use's load during the tower's peak hour (14:00–15:00).
UseConnected (kW)Own block (kW)Own peak hourAt tower peak (kW)Factor at tower peak
Retail podium3,5463,24018:00–19:002,6260.74
Ballroom, meeting and dining1,8021,79814:00–15:001,7981.00
Offices9,3388,38514:00–15:008,3850.90
Hotel guest rooms3,1582,71016:00–17:002,5940.82
Residences4,7884,03816:00–17:003,9380.82
Observation deck1,00798916:00–17:008020.80
Process900900Constant9001.00
Tower24,538–14:00–15:0021,0430.86

Two things follow. First, a "residential factor of 0.82" is not a property of residences. Move the tower to a climate where the offices peak later, add a mall that peaks at noon, or let the hotel become serviced apartments, and every number in the last column changes. Borrowing these factors from another project is the usual source of error.

Second, look at what the common rules of thumb do to the plant. The tower needs 21,043 kW:

The plant on different bases, coastal climate. Shortfall and excess are relative to the simulated block.
BasisPlant (kW)Against the block
Sum of every terminal peak (no diversity)24,538+17 % oversized
Simulated block21,043–
Blanket 0.70 × connected17,17718 % short
Blanket 0.60 × connected14,72330 % short
The asymmetryAn oversized plant costs money and part-load efficiency. An undersized one fails on the hottest afternoons, in front of the client. Error in both directions is common, but only one of them is discovered in operation. That is why the block has to be calculated and written down, not negotiated.

7 · The statistics of usage diversity

Where diversity is genuinely statistical, it follows the arithmetic of adding independent random loads. If each of \(n\) units has a mean usage \(m\) at the peak hour, as a fraction of its full internal gain, and a spread \(s\) between units, the group's design usage at a confidence \(z\) is:

\[ f(n) = \min\!\left(1,\; m + z\,\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}\right) \]

A single room gets \(f = 1\): its terminal must cope with it full. As \(n\) grows the factor falls towards the mean \(m\), quickly at first and then slowly. For the 400 apartments, with \(m\) = 0.75 and \(s\) = 0.30 at 95 % confidence, it is 0.925 for one floor of eight and 0.775 for the whole residential block. The formula applies to internal and occupancy-driven load only, and it assumes the units are independent. A national holiday, Ramadan evenings or a stadium event on the television correlate them, and the diversity disappears; this is why the confidence matters. The mean \(m\) is where measured data belongs. ASHRAE research project RP-1093 compiled lighting and equipment diversity factors from metered office buildings for cooling load calculations [13]. Measured office equipment gives recommended diversity factors of 75 % for computers and 60 % for monitors [14]. The office mean of 0.85 used here covers lighting and people as well as equipment, so it sits above the equipment-only figures, on the safe side.

Statistical usage factor against the number of independent units
f(n) = min(1, m + z·s/√n) on the internal load. Markers show one apartment, one residential floor (8), one hydraulic zone of residences (240) and all of them (400). Log scale on the number of units.
The asymptote: what a very large group averages at the peak hour.
Standard deviation of one unit's usage. Hotel rooms, which are let or not, are high.
1.65 is 95 %, 2.33 is 99 % of design days.
One unit
1.00
One floor (8)
0.925
One zone (240)
0.782
All (400)
0.775

Set the spread to zero and the curve collapses onto the mean: nothing random, nothing statistical to claim. Push the confidence to 2.33 and a floor of eight apartments is back at 0.997, practically no diversity. This is why terminals, floor branches and single-use AHUs see almost none of it, and why the plant sees the most.

8 · What each component is sized on

The rule behind the whole table fits in one sentence. A component is sized on the coincident peak of everything it serves, at that group's own worst hour. A terminal serves one zone, so it takes that zone's peak. A plant serves the tower, so it takes the tower block. Everything in between takes the block of its own group. Diversity is never applied as a factor to a component; it appears because the group is larger.

Sizing basis by component. Values are for the example tower, coastal climate.
ComponentSized onDiversityExample
Fan coil, VAV box, chilled beam, room unitIts zone's own peak (hour and month)NoneWest office perimeter 34.6 kW at 16:00–17:00
Control valve and branch pipe to one terminalThe terminal's design flowNoneSelected on the coil flow, not on a share of it
Fresh-air unit / dedicated outdoor air systemDesign ventilation at the peak outdoor enthalpy [10]None, unless demand-controlled68.7 kW per office floor at 13:00–14:00
Floor AHU (VAV, several zones)Block of its zones; fan airflow on the block, boxes on zone peaksOrientation only219.4 kW against 233.5 summed
Process cooling (IT, telecom, lift rooms)The heat load, 24/7None; standby units carry no load900 kW constant
Floor branch mainFloor block flowOrientation0.94 of the terminal flows on an office floor
RiserBlock of the floors it serves, plus a stated allowance for change of useStatistical, growing with floorsResidential riser near 0.84 of connected
Zone (secondary) pumpsBlock flow of the zone at the achieved ΔTOnly with two-way valvesZone 1: 13,709 kW, 0.88 of connected
Pressure-break heat exchangersBlock of every zone above, in a cascade, at their coincident hourOnly between zones that peak at different hoursHX-A 7,737 kW = sum of the three zones above it
Chillers and primary pumpsTower block + pump heat + distribution gains, then redundancyThe full tower coincidence21,043 kW block
Cooling towersChiller duty plus compressor workAs the plantFollows the chillers, no further factor
District-cooling contract and energy transfer stationTower block plus an explicit marginAs the plant; the network's own diversity is the provider's [11]The contracted capacity is billed; see district cooling
Thermal energy storageThe ton-hours under the design-day curve, not the peakNot applicable347.7 MWh (98,860 ton-hours) a day, load factor 0.69; see storage

Two rows in that table cause most of the site problems: the pumps and the heat exchangers.

Pumps only get diversity from two-way valves. A terminal with a three-way valve draws its full design flow whether it is loaded or not. A circuit full of them has a constant flow equal to the sum of the terminal flows, whatever the load does. Size those pumps on the block and they are short from the day they start [5]. Diversity on the flow requires variable flow at the terminals.

Pumps are sized on flow, not on load. Flow is load divided by \(\rho c_p \Delta T\), and the \(\Delta T\) that matters is the one the system achieves at the peak, not the one on the schedule [6]:

\[ \dot V = \frac{Q}{\rho\, c_p\, \Delta T} \qquad 21{,}043\ \text{kW at } 8\ \text{K} \rightarrow 628\ \text{L/s}; \quad \text{at } 6\ \text{K} \rightarrow 837\ \text{L/s} \;(+33\,\%) \]

A 25 % loss of \(\Delta T\) at the peak costs a third more flow, more than the entire diversity taken between the uses and the zones. If the pumps and risers were cut to the diversified flow at the design \(\Delta T\), they are the first thing to run out.

9 · Interactive: from the block to the plant, the pumps and the heat exchangers

Plant capacity on different bases, and the flows behind it
Bars: the chiller plant sized four ways, against the simulated block (dashed). The selected basis is the block plus losses and the margin policy you set. Readouts: the selected plant, what is installed with one standby chiller, the primary flow at the design and the achieved ΔT, and the duty of the lowest heat exchanger in the cascade.
Default usage assumptions for the block.
Added once, at the plant.
The safety margin each designer adds.
1 = one margin, at the plant. 3 = load calculation, coil and plant each add theirs.
Chilled-water temperature difference on the schedule.
What the coils actually return. Degraded ΔT raises the flow for the same load.
Equal units, N+1.
Selected plant
23,842 kW
Installed N+1
5 × 5,961 kW
Against the block
+13 %
Flow at design / achieved ΔT
711 / 647 L/s
HX-A duty
7,737 kW

With 3 % for pump heat and distribution gains and one 10 % margin at the plant, the plant is 23,842 kW, 13 % above the block: a defensible, stated allowance. Let three designers each add their 10 % and the same plant is 28,849 kW, 37 % above the block, more than the 24,538 kW of having taken no diversity at all. Margins compound; diversity does not rescue them. Lower the achieved ΔT to 6 K and the primary flow the load needs rises to 862 L/s, above what pumps sized at the design ΔT deliver.

The heat-exchanger cascade

Megatall chilled water is broken into pressure zones by plate heat exchangers, and in a cascade each exchanger feeds the zone above it through the next one [7]. That changes the question. HX-A does not serve "Zone 2". It serves Zones 2, 3 and 4 together, so its duty is the coincident block of all three:

Coastal climate. Flows at an 8 K secondary ΔT.
ExchangerServesCoincident block (kW)Sum of zone peaks (kW)Flow (L/s)
HX-AZones 2, 3, 47,7377,737231
HX-BZones 3, 45,0275,027150
HX-CZone 42,6042,60478

The block equals the sum: hotel rooms, residences and the deck all peak together at 16:00–17:00, so there is no diversity to take between the cascaded zones. Their diversity is already inside each zone, in the statistics of their rooms and apartments. An exchanger sized on the sum of its zones' blocks, times a further tower factor, is short. Each stage also adds its approach temperature, so the top zone receives the warmest water; its coils need the capacity, but that is a coil selection question, not a diversity one. The hydraulics are in chilled-water pumps in megatall buildings.

10 · The traps that cancel diversity on site

11 · Writing it into the design basis

The argument with the designer ends when the diversity is a documented calculation rather than a percentage. What to require:

A basis statement you can use"Terminal units, their valves and branches are selected on each zone's own peak with no diversity. Air-handling units, floor mains, risers, zone pumps and heat exchangers are sized on the coincident block of the zones they serve, at that group's own peak hour, from the hourly load calculation. Heat exchangers in the cascade carry the block of every zone above them. Usage diversity is applied to internal and occupancy-driven loads only, using the unit counts and assumptions in Appendix X; no diversity is applied to envelope or design ventilation loads. The central plant is sized on the tower block of X kW, plus Y % for pump heat and distribution gains and a single design margin of Z %, with N+1 redundancy. Pumps and risers are sized for an achieved ΔT of W K."

12 · Design checklist

References & standards

  1. IEEE Std 141 (IEEE Recommended Practice for Electric Power Distribution for Industrial Plants): definitions of demand, diversity and coincidence factors, from which the HVAC usage is borrowed.
  2. ASHRAE Handbook — Fundamentals, Nonresidential Cooling and Heating Load Calculations: zone peak versus block load, the radiant time series method and hourly schedules.
  3. ANSI/ASHRAE/ACCA Standard 183, Peak Cooling and Heating Load Calculations in Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings: the procedure for design peak and block loads.
  4. ASHRAE Handbook — Fundamentals, Climatic Design Information: design-day dry-bulb, daily range and humidity used to build the hourly outdoor conditions.
  5. ASHRAE Handbook — HVAC Systems and Equipment, Hydronic Heating and Cooling: variable-flow systems, two-way and three-way valves, pipe and pump sizing.
  6. Taylor, S.T. “Degrading Chilled Water Plant Delta-T: Causes and Mitigation.” ASHRAE Transactions 108(1), 2002: the causes and cost of low ΔT and its effect on flow and pumping.
  7. ASHRAE, Design Guide for Tall, Supertall, and Megatall Building Systems, 2nd ed.: vertical zoning, heat-exchanger pressure breaks and load characteristics in tall buildings.
  8. ASHRAE Handbook — HVAC Applications, Tall Buildings: system arrangements, stack effect and part-load operation in tall buildings.
  9. ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1, Energy Standard for Sites and Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings: system design loads calculated to Standard 183 for equipment sizing.
  10. ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1, Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air Quality: design ventilation rates and demand-controlled ventilation.
  11. ASHRAE, District Cooling Guide: building connections, contracted capacity and network diversity between buildings.
  12. CIBSE Guide A, Environmental Design: thermal design, plant sizing and design margins.
  13. Abushakra, B., Haberl, J.S. and Claridge, D.E. “Overview of Existing Literature on Diversity Factors and Schedules for Energy and Cooling Load Calculations.” ASHRAE Transactions 110(1), 2004 (ASHRAE RP-1093): lighting and equipment diversity factors from metered office buildings.
  14. Wilkins, C.K. and Hosni, M.H. “Plug Load Design Factors.” ASHRAE Journal 53(5), May 2011, pp. 30–34: measured diversity of office equipment and design plug-load factors.
  15. Saudi Building Code SBC 501 (Mechanical), §312.1: system design loads to be determined to ASHRAE/ACCA Standard 183 or an approved equivalent procedure.
#ChilledWater #Diversity #DiversityFactor #CoincidenceFactor #SimultaneityFactor #BlockLoad #PeakLoad #CoolingLoad #LoadCalculation #ASHRAE183 #RadiantTimeSeries #MixedUse #MegatallBuildings #TallBuildings #HotelHVAC #ResidentialHVAC #FanCoilUnits #AHU #DOAS #HeatExchangers #PressureZoning #ChilledWaterPumps #DeltaT #LowDeltaT #ChillerPlant #DistrictCooling #ThermalEnergyStorage #DesignMargins #GulfEngineering #MEP #HVAC